|
Home
Search
Print
Login
Add Bookmark
-
Father |
Charles Frederick Plummer, b. 11 Aug 1872, Richmond, Tasmania, Australia , d. 5 Feb 1952, Glenorchy, Tasmania, Australia |
Relationship |
Natural |
Mother |
Caroline Mary Forsyth, b. 9 Oct 1885, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia , d. 9 Dec 1962, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia |
Relationship |
Natural |
Married |
Abt 1903 |
Tasmania, Australia |
Family ID |
F7 |
Group Sheet |
-
Notes |
The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954)
Thu 15 Jul 1926
Page 5
SINGLE WOMAN'S DEATH
EVIDENCE AT INQUEST.
The inquest on the body of Sylvia
Violet Plummer, who died in the Hobart
Public Hospital on Tuesday morning, was
opened yesterday by the Coroner (Mr. H.
S. 1!. Wright). Evidence of identification
was given by Violet Elsie Plummer, re-
siding at 03 Giblin-street. New Town, the
sister of thc deceased. She said thc de-
ceased was 22 years of ase at the time of
her death, and unmarried.
DctectiveSuperintendent Oakes stated
that the young woman was ad-
mitted to the Hospita] some days
ago in a septic condition. The
police had their suspicions as to the
cause of deatih, and required time to make
an investigation. One of the chief wit-
nesses was out of the State. He asked
for an adjournment until July 20. I
This was granted.
The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954)
Wed 21 Jul 1926
Page 5
YOUNG WOMAN'S DEATH
RESULT OF ILLEGAL OPERATION.
CORONER'S VERDICT.
The Coroner (Mr. Harold Wright'),
after inquiring yesterday into the death
of Sylvia Violet Plummer, single, aged 23,
which occurred at the Hobart Public Hos-
pital on July 13, returned a verdict that
death was due to an illegal operation, but
by whom it was performed there was no
evidence to show. The inquest was held
in the magistrate's room at the police
station. Mr. Eric Johnson represented
Frederick Herbert Eiszele, who made a
statement that he had had relations with
the young woman, but knew nothing
about the cause of her death. The pro-
ceedings were conducted by Chief Detec-
tive-Inspector Oakes.
Dr. Ratten,l Surgeon-Superintendent of
the Hobart Public Hospital, stated that
Sylvia Plummer was admitted to the hos-
pital on July 8, in a septic condition.
The usual treatment was applied, but her
condition did not improve. Subsequently,
he found that a criminal abortion had
been committed, and he reported it to the
police. The young woman died on July 13.
Detective-Sergt. Fleming stated he in-
terviewed the deceased about her condi-
tion. That was when she was in the hos-
pital. She told him she had been brought
to the hospital from a dilapidated two
story place in Macquarie-street, but did
not know who it was brought her. She
also said she had been up at the house
for a few days. She had been employed
at the Mental Diseases Hospital at New
Norfolk, where she said she had a fall on
some asphalt and felt very ill afterwards.
Jane Bennet Power, matron at the
Mental Diseases Hospital, said the de-
ceased had been at the institution since
April 9, 1924. On Monday, July 5, she
left on 14 days leave but she did not
mention to witness that she was ill from
the result of a fall, or that she intended getting married while away.
Ottilie Ohlsen, crtincated nurse, who
said she kept a private hospital at 88
Goulburn-street, stated she failed to re-
member a girl named Plummer coming to
the hospital. She had never seen her.
Neither to her knowledge did a man
named Eiszele call at the hospital and
inquire about the condition of a girl. Her
sister often attended to patients, and did
not always mention their names.
Violet Elsie Plummer, sister of the de-
ceased, residing at New Town, said she
visited her sister in the hospital on July
9. She said the detectives had been to
see her in the morning about her condi-
tion, but, having promised to tell them
nothing, she had told them she had been
to the Ouse in order to put them off the
track. She also said: "The dreadful
woman almost killed me and then brought
me to the hospital." She however, could
not remember the woman's name, nor did
she see her face properly, because her
eyes were affected.
Mr. Oakes: You say she said she misled
the detective in order to keep her pro-
mise?-Yes.
Mr. Oakes: Did she say what the pro-
mise was?-No.
Mr. Oakes: Did she tell her mother
about it?-No, she thought she might get
better, and did not want to say anything
about it.
Mr. Oakes: Did the deceased ever tell
you about her private affairs, and that
she was to become a mother?-No, never.
Mr. Oakes: Do you know with whom
she was keeping company?-Yes, with
Frederick Eiszele. She did not want to
get married, because she thought she was
wanted to look after the home. She went
to Nurse Ollsen's rest home in order to
have her eyes attended to. Before she
died she asked witness to explain every-
thing to her mother.
Mr. Oakes: And did you explain?-I
had nothing to explain.
Frederick Herbert Eiszele, painter, resid-
ing at 20 Lille-street, Glebe, said he was
21 years of age. He had been keeping
company with the deceased for the past 17
months. She was employed at the Men-
tal Diseases Hospital, New Norfolk, and
he was engaged at New Town. About
five weeks ago he was at New Norfolk for
the week-end, and about 8.15 o'clock on
the Saturday night he went to the regatta
ground with deceased. They returned to
the hospital about 10 o'clock. Ho did not
think he told Mrs. Plummer he was re-
sponsible for her death. The next he
heard of her was on July 10, when Mrs
Plummer told him her daughter was in
the Hobart Hospital, and asked him to
go and see her, which he did. He was
with her when she died. He did not ask
her how she came to get into her condi
tion. During the previous four weeks he
had met her several times, and she never
complained of anything wrong. He did
not know Nurse Olsen.
Mr.Oakes produced several letters
which witness admitted were in his hand
writing.
"I sent the best remedy I could pos-
sibly get," Mr. Oakes read out from one
of the letters. To what did that refer
he asked?
Witness: They were some small pills
that I sent her for a backache. She often
complained of it.
Mr. Oakes: And then there is this in
another letter: "Our mix-up cannot be
done for £15, but for £25. I have been
scouting round, and find that is so.'
What does that refer to?
Witness: That was to be the cost of
our marriage and a holiday.
Mr: Oakes: But the "mix-up"- was that
your marriage?
Witness: Yes.
Mr. Oakes: And what do you say to
this: "We will talk things over, but I
will make arrangements before it comes"?
Witness: That refers to the arrange-
ment I was to make to get away from
work.
Mr. Oakes (to the Coroner): I put these
letters in as exhibits.
Witness, in reply to Mr Johnson, said
he had nothing to hide in the letters. He
repeatedly urged the girl to marry him,
and in the end she promised to do so.
CORONER'S VERDICT.
Mr. Oakes: That is all the evidence we
have to offer you, Mr. Coroner.
The Coroner said he had listened to
the evidence very carefully. There was
no doubt that an abortion was effected,
but there was no evidence to show who
committed it. Death was due to the per-
formancc of an illegal operation.
|
|
|